|
|
Study on the Relationship between LDL-C,RC and the Occurrence of Cardiovascular Events in Elderly Patients with Essential Hypertension |
Sun Yanlei, Chen Hang, Cui Yangyang |
General Medicine Department of Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jiangsu Nanjing 210000,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective This study aims to explore the relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C),residual cholesterol(RC)and cardiovascular events in elderly patients with essential hypertension.Methods 138 elderly essential hypertension patients were divided into 32 cases and 106 cases according to the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events.The general data,admission serum TC,HDL-C,LDL-C,RC level,and neurological function score(NHISS)were compared between the two groups,and the ROC curve was used to analyze the prediction value of the above index level of cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension.Results Comparison of disease duration,dietary habits,blood pressure level,hypertension grades Ⅱ-Ⅲ,family history of CAD in the incident and no incident group,The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);High lipid levels TC,HDL-C,and RC in the incident group compared with patients in the naive group,LDL-C was lower than that in the untreated group,The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);Higher left ventricular end diastolic internal diameter(LVDD),left ventricular systolic end internal diameter(LVSD)than the occurrence group,Low left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)than in the untreated group,The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);Area under the ROC curve of serum lipid TC,HDL-C,LDL-C,and RC levels for predicting cardiovascular events in patients(Area Under Curve,AUC)were 0.693,0.694,0.754,and 0.769,respectively,Sensitivity was 68.75%,62.50%,78.12%,and 62.50%,respectively,Specific was 68.87%,73.58%,64.15%,88.68%,The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions TC,HDL-C,LDL-C and RC levels are associated with cardiovascular events in elderly patients with essential hypertension and can be used to assess potential cardiovascular disease risk.
|
Received: 01 March 2024
|
|
|
|
|
[1] S Machado IB,Tofanelli MR,Saldanha da Silva AA,et al.Factors Associated with Primary Hypertension in Pediatric Patients:An Up-to-Date.Curr Pediatr Rev.2021;17(1):15-37. [2] Hall JE,Mouton AJ,da Silva AA,,et al.Obesity.Obesity,kidney dysfunction,and inflammation:interactions in hypertension.Cardiovasc Res.2021,7;117(8):1859-1876. [3] 王馨,马明艳,张林峰,等.高血压人群LDL-C水平与脑卒中患病状况的关系研究[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2022,20(22):4083-4087. [4] 施自伦,朱临,周丽丽.LP(a)、LDL-C、ApoA1、HbA1c、FDP及TSH与高血压关系的研究[J].中国实验诊断学,2019,23(6):992-994. [5] 邓林,魏艳霞,高建步.原发性高血压患者残余脂蛋白胆固醇对动脉硬化预测价值的研究[J].心肺血管病杂志,2022,41(10):1060-1065. [6] 陈焱,徐清,周庆志,等.残余胆固醇与心血管疾病风险的研究现状[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2022,30(7):640-644. [7] Ridker PM,Bhatt DL,Pradhan AD,et al.PROMINENT,REDUCE-IT,and STRENGTH Investigators.Inflammation and cholesterol as predictors of cardiovascular events among patients receiving statin therapy:a collaborative analysis of three randomised trials.Lancet.2023,401(10384):1293-1301. [8] 刘兵华,王思尧,李莉.血清巨噬细胞迁移抑制因子与稳定型心绞痛合并高血压患者发生主要不良心血管事件的相关性研究[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2019,11(4):487-490. [9] 王增武,王文.中国高血压防治指南(2018年修订版)解读[J].中国心血管病研究,2019,17(3):193-197. [10] 李文霞,刘丽文,王静,等.2014年欧洲肥厚型心肌病诊断和管理指南心脏性猝死风险评估模型临床应用评估及心血管不良事件危险因素的预测分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2017,45(12):1033-1038. [11] 吴蕊,韩雅琪,闫菲.老年原发性高血压患者伴血管迷走性晕厥的相关研究[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2021,23(8):800-802. [12] 王庆,田海涛,王鸿燕,等.血清同型半胱氨酸及超敏C反应蛋白水平与老年原发性高血压患者颈动脉粥样硬化程度的关系研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2020,20(3):484-487. [13] Luo Y,Peng D.Residual Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk:Focus on Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther.2023 Jan-Dec;28:1074-2484. [14] 巨名飞,刘超,马志刚,等.残余胆固醇水平对急性冠脉综合征患者发病的预测价值[J].吉林大学学报:医学版,2023,49(3):765-769. [15] Duran EK,Aday AW,Cook NR,et al.Triglyceride-Rich Lipoprotein Cholesterol,Small Dense LDL Cholesterol,and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.[J] Am Coll Cardiol.2020,75(17):2122-2135. [16] 胡文涛,李少敏,刘佩佳,等.血脂水平在不同CKD分期患者中与心血管事件和全因死亡预后关系研究[J].新医学,2020,51(6):6. |
[1] |
. [J]. journal1, 2021, 41(1): 122-123. |
|
|
|
|