超声造影定量参数预测卵巢癌合并淋巴结转移的研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8131.2022.02.013

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (481 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To study the value of quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound（CEUS）in predicting lymph node metastasis of ovarian cancer.Methods The clinical data of 63 patients with ovarian cancer diagnosed were retrospectively analyzed and included in the ovarian cancer group;the clinical data of 62 patients with ovarian cancer complicated with lymph node metastasis diagnosed in our hospital during the same period were collected and included in the lymph node metastasis group.The quantitative parameters of CEUS,including transit time,development time,peak time and peak intensity,were recorded and compared between the two groups,and the value of transit time,development time,peak time and peak intensity in predicting ovarian cancer with lymph node metastasis was analyzed.Results The transit time,development time,peak time and peak intensity of lymph node metastasis group were lower than those of ovarian cancer group,the difference was statistically significant（P<0.05）;the receiver operating characteristic curve（ROC curve）was drawn,and the area under the curve（AUC）of CEUS quantitative parameters such as transit time,development time,peak time and peak intensity to predict ovarian cancer with lymph node metastasis was 0.817 、0.863、0.807、0.844.Conclusion CEUS parameters can predict lymph node metastasis of ovarian cancer and provide a basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.

Key words： Ovarian cancer lymph node metastasis

Received: 07 February 2021

PACS:

R457.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wei Minhua

Cite this article:

Wei Minhua. Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Ovarian Cancer by Quantitative Parameters of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound[J]. journal1, 2022, 42(2): 34-35.

URL:

http://www.hrbyybjb.org.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8131.2022.02.013 OR http://www.hrbyybjb.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V42/I2/34

[1] 王朝军,张蕾,霍成.CT联合MRI诊断卵巢癌的价值分析[J].中国实用医刊,2019,46(12):81-84.
[2] Mandato V D,Mastroflippo V,De Marco L,et al.Laparo-scopic approach to an incidentally found pelvic retroperito-neal liposarcoma:Case report and review[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2019,98(15):e15184.
[3] 王丽. 卵巢纤维瘤的超声检查与诊断作用研究[J].影像研究与医学应用,2018,2(4):146-147.
[4] 黄碧芬,郑建清.KLK-11基因表达状态与卵巢癌预后关系的大数据分析[J].临床医学,2019,39(9):12-13.
[5] 李玲,周一波,吴美艳,等.卵巢肿瘤超声造影血流特征与肿瘤恶性程度的相关性研究[J].中华内分泌外科杂志,2018,12(2):150-153.
[6] 杨帆,杨太珠,田甜,等.超声造影在卵巢肿物灌注成像中的诊断价值[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2018,49(4):587-593.
[7] Buza N.Frozen Section Diagnosis of Ovarian Epithelial Tu-mors:Diagnostic Pearls and Pitalls[J].Arch Pathol Lab Med,2019,143(1):47-64.
[8] 郝克,吕晓兰,侯敏.卵巢癌淋巴结转移患者治疗有效率与超声造影定量分析指标和E-cadherin、Vimentin表达的相关性分析[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2018,36(1):10-13.
[9] Lehotska,Rauova,K.Pitfalls of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound(CEUS)in determination of breast tumor biological dignity[J].Neoplasma,2018,65(1):124-131.
[10] 时小青,吴秋花.卵巢癌超声造影参数与血管新生的相关性研究[J].实用癌症杂志,2019,34(8):151-154.
[11] 王霞丽,杨舒萍,吕国荣,等.妇科超声影像报告和数据系统联合三维超声造影鉴别诊断卵巢良恶性肿块[J].中国医学影像技术,2018,34(6):888-892.
[12] Korcakova E,Hynek M,Liska V,et al.Monitoring after radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors:contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)vs.contrast-enhanced computer tomography(CECT),two days after procedure[J].Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub,2018,164(4):162.