|
|
|
| PFNA and Plate Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures |
| Wu Haitao |
| Orthopeadic Surgery,Zhenping Second People's Hospital,Zhenping 474250,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To analyze the clinical effect of proximal femoral nail（PFNA）and plate fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture. Methods 86 patients with intertrochanteric fracture in our hospital from October 2017 to May 2019 were selected and randomly divided into PFNA group（n=43）and plate fixation group（n=43）.The plate fixation group was treated with plate fixation,and the PFNA group was treated with PFNA internal fixation.The perioperative conditions,incidence of complications and Harris hip function scale（Harris）scores before operation,6 months after operation and 12 months after operation were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with plate fixation group,PFNA group had less intraoperative blood loss,shorter operation time,hospitalization time and fracture healing time（P<0.05）;Harris score of PFNA group was higher than that of plate fixation group at 6 months and 12 months after operation（P<0.05）;the incidence of complications in PFNA group was 2.33%（1/43）and that of plate fixation group was 11.63%（5/43）,with no significant difference（P>0.05）. Conclusion The use of PFNA internal fixation for patients with intertrochanteric fractures of the femur can improve the perioperative condition,accelerate the fracture prognosis and functional recovery process,and has safety.
|
|
Received: 01 December 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 郭新安,薛辉.防旋型股骨近端髓内钉与髋关节置换术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折临床疗效比较[J].河北医学,2017,23(1):144-147.
[2] 侯宇,姚琦,张亘瑷,等.第三代Gamma钉与防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折术后股骨近端短缩的比较研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2018,32(3):338-345.
[3] 袁伟. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术治疗84例股骨粗隆间骨折患者的疗效观察[J].首都食品与医药,2018,25(17):18.
[4] 何苗,邓志龙,曹志东,等.防旋型股骨近端髓内钉内固定术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折患者的生物力学性能[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(8):989-994. |
| [1] |
. [J]. journal1, 2021, 41(2): 58-59. |
| [2] |
. [J]. journal1, 2021, 41(2): 47-48. |
| [3] |
. [J]. journal1, 2021, 41(1): 76-77. |
|
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 41 
