2025年05月25日 星期日 首页   |   期刊介绍   |   编 委 会   |   投稿指南   |   期刊订阅   |   广告合作   |   联系我们   |   ENGLISH
哈尔滨医药  2021, Vol. 41 Issue (5): 14-15    
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术、硕通镜钬激光碎石术在输尿管上段结石ESWL治疗失败患者中的应用
何小峰
河南省三门峡市中心医院泌尿外科,河南 三门峡472000
Application of Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Shuotongureteroscopic Lithotripsy in Patients With Failure of ESWL Treatment of Upper Ureteral Calculi
He Xiaofeng
Department of Urology,Sanmenxia Central Hospital,Sanmenxia 472000,China
全文: PDF (465 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 对比输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术(Flexible ureteroscopic lithothripsy,FURL)与硕通镜钬激光碎石术(Shuotong ureteroscopic lithotripsy,STL)在输尿管上段结石ESWL(Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,ESWL)治疗失败患者中的应用效果。方法 回顾性分析76例输尿管上段结石ESWL治疗失败的患者,根据治疗方法不同,将其分为A组(STL,40例)与B(FURL,36例),对比两组患者的术中手术和术后住院时间,术后感染率,术后1d和1个月的结石清除率,直径大于和小于2cm结石术后1d和1个月的清除率,并分析其原因。结果 两组患者手术时间对比,B组时间显著短于A组(P<0.05);术后住院时间B组略短于A组,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1个月总清除率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但术后1d结石清除率对比A组较B组显效(P<0.05);直径大于2cm结石清除率A组明显优于B组(P<0.05),对于直径小于2cm的结石总清除率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 FURL和STL治疗经ESWL治疗失败的输尿管上段结石效果均很显著,治疗直径大于2cm结石STL效果优于FURL。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
何小峰
关键词 输尿管软镜钬激光硕通镜钬激光体外冲击波碎石    
AbstractObjective To compare the application effects of flexible ureteroscopic lithothripsy(FURL)and Shuotong ureteroscopic lithotripsy(STL)on patients with failure of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL)treatment of upper ureteral calculi. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 76 patients with upper ureteral calculi who failed ESWL treatment.According to different treatment methods,the patients were divided into group A(STL,40 cases)and group B(FURL,36 cases).The intraoperative surgical time and postoperative hospital stay,postoperative infection rate,stone clearance rate at 1 d and 1 month after surgery and clearance rates of stones with diameters larger than or less than 2 cm at 1 d and 1 month after surgery were compared between the two groups,and the causes were analyzed. Results The surgical time of group B was significantly shorter than that of group A(P<0.05).The postoperative hospital stay of group B was slightly shorter than that of group A(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the total clearance rate at 1 month after surgery(P>0.05),but the stone clearance rate in group A was significantly better than that in group B at 1 d after surgery(P<0.05).The clearance rate of stones with diameter larger than 2cm in group A was significantly better than that in group B(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in the total clearance rate of stones with diameter less than 2cm(P>0.05). Conclusion Both FURL and STL are significantly effective in treating upper ureteral calculi with failure of ESWL treatment.STL is better than FURL in treating stones with diameter larger than 2 cm.
Key wordsFlexible ureteroscopic holmium laser    Shuotong ureteroscopic holmium laser    Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
收稿日期: 2020-11-20     
PACS:  R714.258  
引用本文:   
何小峰. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术、硕通镜钬激光碎石术在输尿管上段结石ESWL治疗失败患者中的应用[J]. 哈尔滨医药, 2021, 41(5): 14-15.
He Xiaofeng. Application of Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Shuotongureteroscopic Lithotripsy in Patients With Failure of ESWL Treatment of Upper Ureteral Calculi. journal1, 2021, 41(5): 14-15.
链接本文:  
http://www.hrbyybjb.org.cn/CN/     或     http://www.hrbyybjb.org.cn/CN/Y2021/V41/I5/14
版权所有 © 《哈尔滨医药》编辑部  备案号: 黑ICP备19005758号-1
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn