|
|
|
| Application of 3D-VIBE Dynamic Enhanced MRI Quantitative Parameter Combined Model in Differential Diagnosis of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer |
| Xu Jingyuan, Liu Qiang, Zhao Aobo |
| Sanmenxia Central Hospital, Sanmenxia, Henan 472000 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a combined 3D-VIBE dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantitative parameter model in the differential diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical and imaging data of patients with pathologically confirmed epithelial ovarian tumors admitted to our hospital from January 2023 to December 2025.Based on pathological examination results,100 patients were divided into a benign epithelial ovarian tumor group(benign group,n=40) and an epithelial ovarian cancer group(malignant group,n=60).All patients underwent routine MRI and 3D-VIBE dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI scans preoperatively.Quantitative parameters were compared between the two groups,and a combined quantitative parameter model was constructed.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the differential diagnostic efficacy of single quantitative parameters and the combined model. Results The levels of Ktrans,Kep,and MS in the malignant group were higher than those in the benign group,while the levels of TTP and Ve were lower in the malignant group(all P<0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the five quantitative parameters(Ktrans,Kep,Ve,MS,and TTP) were closely related to the incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer(P<0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the AUCs for the combined diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer by the five parameters(Ktrans,Kep,Ve,MS,and TTP) were 0.548,0.716,0.825,0.774,and 0.904,respectively.Z-tests showed that the combined diagnostic efficacy was higher than that of the individual parameters(Z=7.753,12.656,2.992,4.229,and 23.212,all P<0.05). Conclusion The 3D-VIBE dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantitative parameter combined model(Ktrans,Kep,Ve,MS,TTP) can effectively integrate the diagnostic information of multiple quantitative parameters,which helps to improve the differential diagnosis efficacy between epithelial ovarian cancer and benign epithelial ovarian tumors.Its sensitivity and specificity are higher than those of single-parameter diagnosis.
|
|
Received: 01 April 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 马丽颖,孙美玉,王成艳,等.双指数和拉伸指数模型IVIM-MRI对上皮性卵巢癌分型的诊断价值[J].放射学实践,2023,38(4):452-458. [2] 柯楠,刘凯,陈娇,等.MRI联合血清TSGF、NDRG4在上皮性卵巢癌诊断中的作用[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2024,22(4):119-121. [3] 魏明翔,丁聪,严彩英,等.基于多参数MRI影像组学方法鉴别Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型上皮源性卵巢癌[J].临床放射学杂志,2023,42(10):1636-1641. [4] 王心怡,魏明翔,陈双庆.基于T2加权MRI瘤周和瘤内影像组学模型术前预测上皮性卵巢癌FIGO分期[J].磁共振成像,2024,15(6):100-106. [5] 赵学焕,刘秋美,丁洁,等.MRI联合糖类抗原125及人附睾蛋白4鉴别诊断Ⅰ型与Ⅱ型上皮性卵巢癌[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2024,21(9):549-552. [6] 徐辉景,李志平,颜丹,等.基于MRI影像特征鉴别原发性输卵管癌和原发性上皮性卵巢癌的价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2022,33(8):567-571. [7] 张晖,连鹏,杨璐,等.DCE-MRI半定量参数联合血清学指标鉴别卵巢交界性肿瘤和上皮性卵巢癌的价值[J].重庆医学,2021,50(14):2402-2406,2411. [8] 冀舒文,陈先国,刘伟,等.MRI 3D-VIBE动态增强联合常规扫描诊断早期前列腺癌[J].临床放射学杂志,2021,40(4):762-766. [9] 董思情,马巧稚,吴春楠,等.3D-VIBE与3D-FLASH序列肝胆特异期Gd-EOB-DTPA增强MR胆道成像显示胆道系统图像质量及检出病变[J].中国医学影像技术,2023,39(6):866-871. [10] 戴雨波. 磁共振3D-VIBE序列动态增强扫描在卵巢癌分期诊断中的应用[J].现代医用影像学,2024,33(11):2104-2107. |
| [1] |
. [J]. journal1, 2026, 46(5): 103-106. |
| [2] |
. [J]. journal1, 2026, 46(5): 117-119. |
| [3] |
. [J]. journal1, 2026, 46(4): 48-51. |
| [4] |
. [J]. journal1, 2026, 46(4): 97-99. |
| [5] |
. [J]. journal1, 2026, 46(3): 52-55. |
| [6] |
. [J]. journal1, 2026, 46(3): 84-86. |
|
|
|
|