腹腔镜疝修补术（TAPP）与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床效果对比

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8131.2023.06.007

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (11)

Download: PDF (410 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective Comparing the clinical effects of laparoscopic hernia repair（TAPP）and open tension free hernia repair for adult inguinal hernia. Methods 60 adult patients with inguinal hernia who underwent surgical treatment were randomLy divided into two groups.The control group used open tension free hernia repair as the main treatment method, while the observation group used TAPP as the main treatment method.A comprehensive analysis was conducted on the treatment status of the two groups of patients. Results The postoperative surgical time, bleeding volume, pain, and hospitalization time of the two groups of patients were compared, and the improvement in the observation group was better than that in the control group（P< 0.05）; The incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group（P< 0.05）; The disappearance time of induration, foreign body sensation, and inguinal numbness in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group（P< 0.05）. Conclusion After using TAPP treatment, patients will experience less postoperative pain, less trauma, lower stress response, faster recovery, and fewer complications.

Key words： Adult inguinal hernia Laparoscopic hernia repair Open tension free hernioplasty Clinical effects

Received: 25 December 2022

PACS:

R656.2+1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wang Yixue

Cite this article:

Wang Yixue. Comparison of Clinical Effects between Laparoscopic Hernioplasty（TAPP）and Open Tension Free Hernioplasty in the Treatment of Adult Inguinal Hernia[J]. journal1, 2023, 43(6): 17-19.

URL:

http://www.hrbyybjb.org.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8131.2023.06.007 OR http://www.hrbyybjb.org.cn/EN/Y2023/V43/I6/17

[1] 刘鑫斌, 陈超, 胡琛.开放式无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效比较[J].泰山医学院学报, 2018, 39(7):832-834.
[2] 韦晓远. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床对比[J].临床普外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(4):83-86, 113.
[3] 孙凯, 张泽俊, 张亚, 等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(3):243-246.
[4] 曹亮, 王步云.对比分析开放式无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J].贵州医药, 2020, 44(3):410-412.
[5] 中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会.成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(7):721-724.
[6] 刘凯, 左武, 王斌, 等.腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果对比[J].中国当代医药, 2020, 27(11):70-72.
[7] 周正赟, 成建璋, 施文文, 等.腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝疗效对比[J].系统医学, 2020, 5(20):68-70.
[8] 朱冠鹏. 腹腔镜腹膜前疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J].吉林医学, 2021, 42(2):462-463.
[9] 陈骞. 腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床效果分析[J].基层医学论坛, 2019, 23(28):4032-4033.
[10] 黄火成, 吴登东, 刘秀媚.腹腔镜经腹膜前疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的对比研究[J].现代诊断与治疗, 2019, 30(10):1708-1709.
[11] 卢小冬. 腹腔镜疝修补术及开放式无张力疝修补术用于治疗成人腹股沟疝疗效探讨[J].临床普外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(2):49-51, 68.