|
|
Analysis of the Diagnostic Value of Low-frequency Combined with High-frequency Ultrasound in Gallbladder Polypoid Lesions |
Cai Mingyue |
Physical Examination Department of Luohe Sixth People's Hospital 462000 |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the diagnostic value of low-frequency combined with high-frequency ultrasound in gallbladder polypoid lesions(PLG),in order to provide scientific basis for accurately formulating prevention and treatment strategies in clinical practice. Methods 93 PLG patients were selected as the survey subjects,all of whom underwent low-frequency ultrasound,low-frequency combined high-frequency ultrasound examination,and surgical pathology examination.Record the surgical pathological results,count the detection results of PLG by low-frequency ultrasound alone or low-frequency combined high-frequency ultrasound,and use the surgical pathological results as the gold standard for PLG diagnosis.Analyze the diagnostic efficacy of low-frequency ultrasound and low-frequency combined high-frequency ultrasound in detecting PLG,and analyze the consistency between the results of low-frequency ultrasound and low-frequency combined high-frequency ultrasound in diagnosing PLG and the pathological results. Results Among the 93 PLG patients,77(82.80%)were found to be benign PLG and 16(17.20%)were found to be malignant PLG through surgical and pathological examination;The diagnostic sensitivity of low-frequency combined high-frequency ultrasound examination for PLG(93.75%)was slightly higher than that of low-frequency ultrasound examination alone(75.00%),and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05);The diagnostic specificity(92.21%)and accuracy(92.47%)of low-frequency combined high-frequency ultrasound examination for PLG were higher than those of low-frequency ultrasound examination alone(71.43%,72.04%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);The consistency between low-frequency ultrasound diagnosis of PLG and surgical pathological results was poor(Kappa=0.321,P=0.000),while the combination of low-frequency and high-frequency ultrasound diagnosis of PLG showed high consistency with surgical pathological results(Kappa=0.765,P=0.000). Conclusion The application value of low-frequency combined with high-frequency ultrasound in clinical diagnosis of PLG is high,which can reduce misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis,and provide accurate basis for clinical prevention and treatment strategies.
|
Received: 19 May 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 朱连华,韩鹏,姜波,等.微血流成像能准确鉴别和诊断胆囊息肉样病变[J].南方医科大学学报,2022,42(6):922-928. [2] 田思雨,戴婷,孙志霞,等.超声造影联合超微血管成像在胆囊隆起性病变诊断中的应用[J].中国试验诊断学,2021,25(1):61-64. [3] 蒋波,章小龙,罗志艳.高频联合低频超声在胆囊腺肌增生症术前分型诊断中的应用价值[J].浙江创伤外科,2022,27(2):366-367. [4] 刘玉华,姚晓会.高频超声联合低频超声检查对胆囊腺肌增生症患者的诊断价值[J].河南医学研究,2021,30(35):6666-6668. [5] 黄亚莉,付雪莲.高频超声联合多普勒超声对良性胆囊息肉样病变诊断的价值分析[J].山西医药杂志,2020,49(7):811-813. [6] 费翔,李楠,唐文博,等.超声造影评价胆囊息肉样病变的临床价值[J].临床超声医学杂志,2021,23(10):737-740. [7] Shinji O.Role of conventional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gallbladder polypoid lesions[J].Journal of medical ultrasonics,2021,48(2):149-157. [8] 沈荣霞. 低频超声联合高频超声在胆囊息肉样病变鉴别诊断中的应用[J].药店周刊,2021,30(31):163. [9] 王沫. 高低频超声联合检查对胆囊腺肌增生症的诊断价值[J].医疗装备,2020,33(11):49-50. [10] 王佳慧,袁二伟.低频联合高频超声对小儿肠套叠的诊断效果研究[J].影像科学与光化学,2020,38(5):906-909. [11] 刘晓盼. HFUS+CDFI检查在胆囊息肉样病变诊断中的应用价值[J].辽宁医学杂志,2022,36(5):77-79. [12] 李艳,刘芬,谢桢,等.高频超声联合低频超声检查诊断新生儿颅脑病变的临床价值研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2022,22(10):1932-1936. |
[1] |
Huang Zufeng, Li Duo, Zhai Xueyan. Application of Combined Detection of Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Urinary Microalbumin/Creatinine Ratio in the Diagnosis of Heart Failure[J]. journal1, 2024, 44(2): 5-7. |
[2] |
. [J]. journal1, 2024, 44(2): 62-64. |
[3] |
. [J]. journal1, 2024, 44(2): 79-81. |
[4] |
Liu Yang, Seng Xueyan, Liu Yi. Clinical Value of Free Fetal DNA in Peripheral Blood For the Diagnosis of Chromosome Aneuploidy[J]. journal1, 2023, 43(2): 22-24. |
[5] |
Cao Xiaohan, Chen Weixian. Clinical Significance of Serum Immunoglobulin,Light Chain Quantification and Fructosamine in The Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma[J]. journal1, 2023, 43(2): 44-46. |
[6] |
. [J]. journal1, 2022, 42(6): 123-124. |
|
|
|
|