不同通气模式在呼吸衰竭新生儿机械通气中的应用比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8131.2022.01.021

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (413 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the effects of different ventilation modes in mechanical ventilation of newborns with respiratory failure（ARF）. Methods 150 cases of ARF neonates diagnosed and treated were selected for a retrospective study.The children were divided into study group（78 cases）and control group（72 cases）according to different ventilation modes.The former was given SIMV mode,the latter was given CPAP mode.The ventilator ventilation time,hospitalization time,and changes of blood gas indexes before and after treatment were compared between the two groups of children,and the curative effect was evaluated. Results There was no significant difference in the blood gas index levels between the two groups of children before treatment（P>0.05）.After treatment,the arterial partial pressure of oxygen（PO₂）in the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group,and the other blood gas index levels were significantly lower than the control group（P<0.05）.The ventilation time and hospitalization time of children in the study group were significantly less than those in the control group（P<0.05）,the effective rate of children in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group（P<0.05）. Conclusion The application of SIMV in neonates with ARF can improve the blood gas indexes of the infants and promote the recovery of lung compliance,thereby shorten the ventilator treatment time and has a better therapeutic effect.

Key words： SIMV Respiratory failure Neonates Blood gas indicators Ventilation time

Received: 24 December 2020

PACS:

R722.12

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhang Zheng

Cite this article:

Zhang Zheng. Application Comparison of Different Ventilation Modes in Mechanical Ventilation of Newborns With Respiratory Failure[J]. journal1, 2022, 42(1): 49-51.

URL:

http://www.hrbyybjb.org.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8131.2022.01.021 OR http://www.hrbyybjb.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V42/I1/49

[1] 印娟,姜善雨.细节护理管理预防新生儿呼吸衰竭持续气道正压通气并发症的效果[J].安徽医药,2019,23(6):1204-1206.
[2] 岳冬梅,佟雅洁.不同通气方式联合肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较[J].中国小儿急救医学,2018,25(4):297-300.
[3] 姚和平,徐培林,王英英.同步间歇指令通气对呼吸衰竭新生儿血气指标的影响[J].中国医药导报,2018,15(13):72-75.
[4] Wang BC,Pei T,Lin CB,et al.Clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation in acute pediatric respiratory failure[J].World Journal of Critical Care Medicine,2018,7(4):4-9.
[5] 严重急性低氧性呼吸衰竭急诊治疗专家共识组.严重急性低氧性呼吸衰竭急诊治疗专家共识[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2018,27(8):844-849.
[6] 唐烁,包蕾.新生儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征临床特征与预后相关因素分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2019,41(9):898-902.
[7] 聂振清,陈晓燕.机械通气联合不同肺表面活性物质在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的价值[J].安徽医药,2019,23(6):1222-1225.
[8] 许文波,周丽,陈玲.持续气道正压呼吸机联合氨溴索治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床效果观察[J].山西医药杂志,2018,47(6):686-688.
[9] 臧平,卢秀兰,唐亮,等.危重症患儿使用经鼻持续气道正压通气的时机探讨及评估[J].中国小儿急救医学,2018,25(11):808.
[10] 朱文英,袁玉峰,张海燕,等.两种无创正压通气模式联合固尔苏治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较[J].江苏医药,2017,43(24):1826-1827.
[11] 柯华,李占魁,郭金珍,等.神经调节辅助通气和同步间歇指令通气改善早产儿呼吸功能的比较研究[J].中国小儿急救医学,2018,25(2):116-120.
[12] 赵凤兰,刘燕.PAV联合SIMV模式在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征治疗中的应用[J].海南医学,2019,30(6):763-766.
[13] 梁洪,洪小杨,赵喆,等.体外膜氧合支持呼吸衰竭新生儿乳酸水平与预后分析[J].中国体外循环杂志,2019,17(3):157-160.
[14] 原静,李书芳,李亚菲,等.不同机械通气方式治疗新生儿呼吸衰竭的效果及对患儿CC16、KL-6水平的影响[J].河北医科大学学报,2019,40(5):551-555.
[15] 司啸辰,冯捷,康霓.PRVC和P-SIMV通气模式下对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者机械通气参数安全性的研究[J].中国医学装备,2019,16(3):25-27.