|
|
|
| Study on the Status Quo of Neural Development and Early Intervention of Very Low Birth Weight Premature Infants at 1 Year Old When Catching Up With Growth |
| Zeng Yan |
| Nanyang First People's Hospital NICU,Nanyang 473000,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To study the status quo of nerve development and early intervention of very low birth weight premature infants at the age of 1 year.Methods 120 premature infants with very low birth weight who were hospitalized in our hospital were selected as the research object.The follow-up time was 7-10 days after discharge and once every 40 weeks after correction of gestational age,once every month after correction of gestational age of 1-12 months,and the physical development of premature infants was evaluated.The Mental developmental index,MDI）,mental motor developmental index（PDI）and neurological developmental impairment（NDI）of premature infants were observed by infant intelligence development.The status quo of Gesell nerve development and the incidence of neurological sequelae were counted.Results After the intervention,the incidence of NDI was 1.67% at 12 months after correction,which was lower than 7.50% at 6 months（P<0.05）.The scores of PDI and MDI were higher than those of 6 months after correction（P<0.05）.After the intervention,the scores of each index of Gesell's nerve development status of premature infants with corrected age of 12 months were higher than those of 6 months（P<0.05）.The incidence of neurological sequelae was 3.33% at 12 months after correction,which was lower than 13.32% at 6 months（P<0.05）.Conclusion Early intervention measures for low birth weight premature infants can promote the status quo of neurological development and behavioral development during their 1-year-old catch-up growth period,reduce neurological sequelae,improve their prognosis,actively take intervention measures,and strengthen nutrition guidance to promote the healthy development of children.
|
|
Received: 05 January 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 李斌,许天兰,陈蓉.系统性早期干预对极低出生体重儿神经系统发育的影响[J].贵州医药,2018,42(3):332-333.
[2] 张勇,李燕晖,梁静,等.低出生体重早产儿1岁内体格追赶生长的纵向研究[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2020,31(4):413-417.
[3] 展晓玲,钟慈英,朱隆香.早期干预对极低出生体重早产儿神经发育结局的影响[J].中国实用医药,2018,7(2):172-173.
[4] 韩萍,罗小红.延续性护理干预对极低出生体重早产儿婴儿期神经发育的效果评价[J].黑龙江医学,2020,44(5):687-688.
[5] 林莉,肖朝霞,陈关艳,等.早产低出生体重儿婴儿期追赶生长及影响因素研究[J].中国医药科学,2020,10(16):165-168.
[6] 柯海劲,吴婕翎,郭勇,等.早产低出生体重儿婴儿期追赶生长情况分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2018,26(4):427-429.
[7] 袁欣,郝素媛,韩炳娟,等.早期早产儿和/或极低出生体重儿出院后随访及早期干预的临床研究[J].中华围产医学杂志,2015(4):296-299.
[8] 张洪洁,孙海英,李炜,等.综合性早期干预对极低出生体重早产儿身体和智力发育的影响[J].中国现代医生,2020,58(20):70-73.
[9] 桑田,王颖,王红梅,等.极低/超低出生体重早产儿头颅超声检查与神经发育评估的关系[J].中华新生儿科杂志,2020,35(1):4-9.
[10] 侯贺,杨淑梅,高霞.延续性护理干预对极低及超低出生体重早产儿生长发育影响的Meta分析[J].中国医学创新,2018,15(18):91-96.
[11] 唐孟言,刘孝美,彭文涛,等.早产儿12月龄体重追赶生长现状及影响因素分析[J].中华护理杂志,2020,55(8):1159-1163. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 43 
